As in aroused?  Me too.

-----Original Message-----
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST


Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am.

It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited.

-- 
be - MOS



"This is Vergon 6." -Professor 
 "Bah." -Amy 
 "It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little
doomed animals." -Professor 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
> 
> 
> A little behind on your reading Bill?
> 
> Serdar Soysal
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, it works well.  That was never the point.  But, just 
> like a MAPI 
> > session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse 
> mode on OWA.
> > 
> I'm puzzled by this approach, Craig.
> 
> Let's say you're at an airport kiosk. You're going to 
> download the synch
> file, then what? Copy it to a floppy? What if it's more that 
> 1.44MB? What if
> the kiosk doesn't have a floppy drive? If you're using a PDA, 
> how do you
> transfer the file to there?
> 
> OTOH, let's say you're hooked into a WLAN in the Executive 
> Lounge from your
> own laptop or PDA. You can then fire up your VPN software, 
> connect into your
> LAN and synch using the copy of Outlook on your PC. If you don't use
> Outlook, as many others have pointed out, you can use an IMAP client.
> 
> Synchronization to an OST presumes that you have Outlook 
> installed, so why
> re-create the wheel? OWA was built to be run from any browser 
> anywhere (I
> can even convince Opera to load it if I work at it), but like 
> most Web-based
> services, presumes a connection for the duration of the session.
> 
> 
> > I don't get it.  Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping
> > a small and
> > extremely useful feature out of the product?  Is it a "we're 
> > tough, we can
> > take it" sort of thing, or what?
> > 
> 
> Implementation of this isn't trivial, and there already exist multiple
> better ways to do what you want. So why would Microsoft spend money
> developing another one?
> 
> > Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small 
> > machines should
> > only be used as companions to "real" machines.
> 
> Well, no. If you have an IMAP/MAPI client and a Web browser 
> on your handheld
> you're in good shape. But your Web browser sucks as a 
> mailtool, so why not
> use the IMAP/MAPI client?
> 
> >   Sheesh, I 
> > thought that
> > attitude died back in the 80's when the mainframe crowd tried 
> > to convince
> > everyone that OV, HP Desk and All-In-1 were the "real" 
> > workgroup messaging
> > systems, and that LAN mail should be relegated to simple 
> departmental
> > messaging only tasks.
> > 
> > It's amazing.  The PC guys have grown up to become the 
> > dinosaurs that they
> > displaced.
> > 
> 
> I resent that implication. I have not become a PDP/11.
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to