As in aroused? Me too.
-----Original Message----- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST Jumping Jiminey. I guess I am. It's just that Dupler fellow. I get all excited. -- be - MOS "This is Vergon 6." -Professor "Bah." -Amy "It's a sunny little doomed planet, inhabited by a number of frisky little doomed animals." -Professor > -----Original Message----- > From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST > > > A little behind on your reading Bill? > > Serdar Soysal > > > -----Original Message----- > From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:33 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: synchronizing OWA with OST or PST > > > > > > Yes, it works well. That was never the point. But, just > like a MAPI > > session, you should be able to do a synch while in browse > mode on OWA. > > > I'm puzzled by this approach, Craig. > > Let's say you're at an airport kiosk. You're going to > download the synch > file, then what? Copy it to a floppy? What if it's more that > 1.44MB? What if > the kiosk doesn't have a floppy drive? If you're using a PDA, > how do you > transfer the file to there? > > OTOH, let's say you're hooked into a WLAN in the Executive > Lounge from your > own laptop or PDA. You can then fire up your VPN software, > connect into your > LAN and synch using the copy of Outlook on your PC. If you don't use > Outlook, as many others have pointed out, you can use an IMAP client. > > Synchronization to an OST presumes that you have Outlook > installed, so why > re-create the wheel? OWA was built to be run from any browser > anywhere (I > can even convince Opera to load it if I work at it), but like > most Web-based > services, presumes a connection for the duration of the session. > > > > I don't get it. Why are you guys arguing in favor of keeping > > a small and > > extremely useful feature out of the product? Is it a "we're > > tough, we can > > take it" sort of thing, or what? > > > > Implementation of this isn't trivial, and there already exist multiple > better ways to do what you want. So why would Microsoft spend money > developing another one? > > > Or maybe it is that you've bought into the view that small > > machines should > > only be used as companions to "real" machines. > > Well, no. If you have an IMAP/MAPI client and a Web browser > on your handheld > you're in good shape. But your Web browser sucks as a > mailtool, so why not > use the IMAP/MAPI client? > > > Sheesh, I > > thought that > > attitude died back in the 80's when the mainframe crowd tried > > to convince > > everyone that OV, HP Desk and All-In-1 were the "real" > > workgroup messaging > > systems, and that LAN mail should be relegated to simple > departmental > > messaging only tasks. > > > > It's amazing. The PC guys have grown up to become the > > dinosaurs that they > > displaced. > > > > I resent that implication. I have not become a PDP/11. > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]