<getting senile> something about fragmented virtual memory when you have a bunch of mailbox stores... I don't remember and I'm too lazy to go look right now. If you break it down, do it for other reasons, like you want your top brass to be in one store for quicker DR or something. Although "Because Missy said so" is a perfectly valid reason to leave it the hell alone.
-tom > -----Original Message----- > From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 03:17 PM > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > Conversation: Storage Groups and Databases > Subject: Re: Storage Groups and Databases > > > I'd leave well enough alone and leave 'em all in one SG. > Your server's going to be hurting no matter what, but the > KISS principle comes into play here. > > Missy > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Chyka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 3:58 PM > Subject: Storage Groups and Databases > > > Hello, > > once again thanks for the help on an earlier question. i > have one more.... > > we have about 1600 users (no more than 500 concurrent) and > only one server until next year sometime. the server is a > dell 6600 with dual xeon 1.6Ghz processors and 3 gigs of RAM. > it has a Perc RAID card with 128 megs on it and 2 har drives > with RAID 1 for the OS, 2 hard drives with RAID 1 for the > logs, and 3 RAID 5 drives for the database. > > my question is should i configure 1 storage group and 1 > database for all the users or should i break them down. is > there even a performance issue having different storage groups etc. > > thanks for any input.. > > Bob C. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
