Just so happens that I've been in an internal discussion about this and that's what I'm being told myself. I don't disagree with the principles at all. However, your performance really will be dependent upon your application mix and how you map them to the virtual arrays.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 6:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HP/Compaq EVA Does anyone have any experiences with HP/Compaq's Enterprise Virtual Array in regards to Exchange 2000? They'd like us to believe, it seems, that the rules about transaction logs and databases being on seperate physical volumes do not apply using this technology, because fault tolerance is spread across so many volumes in the disk group. Also they would have us believe that with vraid5 for both logs and databases we'd see no performance issues. The big stress is that this isn't your older brother's scsii raid anymore. Thanks. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it, are confidential to National Grid and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the National Grid USA Help desk on 508-389-3375. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
