A consensus? Probably no. But I'd tend to agree that if the controller has a
battery[1], it's OK to have it on.

[1] Those need to be changed regularly.. If this is news to you, you should
have the cache disabled.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> 
> Is there a concensus on this?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:12 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> 
> I always thought that write-back cache should be always 
> turned off, whether it has battery or not.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:29 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> 
> hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only 
> recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the 
> controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might 
> be the case.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> 
> Don't do diskkeeper against your store.  The rest of your 
> disk stats look to be OK.  Maybe someone else can give you 
> better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help 
> track down the issue.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> 
> The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used 
> with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive.  
> The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. 
>  We just migrated the users over to this server about four 
> weeks ago.  I have not run diskkeeper on it though.  
> 
> Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive.  
> 
> Wilson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> What kind of shape is your drive in?  Have you run diskkeeper 
> on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you 
> be running short of space?  How does your page file compare 
> to your RAM?
> 
> David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> 
> Thanks.  I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is 
> being heavily used.  There is a lot of information in the 
> calendars and quite a few people use it heavily.  I'll keep 
> poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is 
> screaming in your ear that "email is down".
> 
> 
> Wilson
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a 
> network issue.  Run perfmon on the interface and check the 
> kb's.  Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was 
> running at like 80 and killing the box.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Slow performance
> 
> How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your 
> calander that people access at the same time?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Slow performance
> 
> 
> Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users)  The 
> machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN.  The 
> store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index 
> files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition.
> 
> 
> Calendar and folder switching is very slow.  Takes about 45 
> seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the 
> calendar.  Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook 
> for several minutes.
> 
> The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything 
> else I can do to speed this up a bit?
> 
> If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wilson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to