Seems to be the case. Thanks, Chris. I'll alert the user to the happy news.
..sakes. Tim. x3683 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR PFs don't do NDRs. By design. -----Original Message----- From: Tim Ault To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/13/2002 10:37 AM Subject: RE: A question of NDR >From the "This Just in" Dept.: The "secondary mailbox" is actually a PF against which the user has "User" permission. The PF is configured correctly to receive inbound email. "return-path" with the address of the origin mailbox appears in the header of NDR(s) in the origin mailbox. So maybe we have the culprit. Off to RFC822 to learn about this header item.. Tim. x3683 -----Original Message----- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A question of NDR You mean like this, which worked as advertised, not as you're experiencing? Come on Tim - you know we need more details. ---<SNIP>---- Received: from atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (atlrelay1.itlogon.com [10.33.1.60]) by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id WL0Y7Z5W; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:13:09 -0500 Received: from inovisns2.inovisinc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFC0r07389 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:12:00 GMT Received: from kepler.wiredeuclid.com (dsl092-212-061.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.212.61]) by inovisns2.inovisinc.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gADFBxLl017685 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:59 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrh19887; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com" Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) This is a MIME-encapsulated message --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/delivery-status --gADFBrh19887.1037200313/kepler.wiredeuclid.com Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by kepler.wiredeuclid.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id gADFBrg19887 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:11:53 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: kepler.wiredeuclid.com: smtpd set sender to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> using -f Received: from UNKNOWN(204.29.140.242), claiming to be "atlrelay1.inovisinc.com" via SMTP by kepler, id smtpde23048; Wed Nov 13 15:11:45 2002 Received: from atlexcon1.itlogon.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlrelay1.inovisinc.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gADFBZr07362 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:11:44 GMT Received: by atlexcon1.itlogon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <WL0Y7Z5J>; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:41 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Testing NDR Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:12:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain ---<SNIP>---- ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:25 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: A question of NDR > > > oh come on, andy.. test the accuracy of your reply > > send a message from a mailbox that appears to be from another. monitor > the inbox of the other mailbox. you'll find an NDR to a bogus > address appears in > the mailbox named in the From field > > > > Tim. > x3683 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:59 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: A question of NDR > > > By design I believe. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:55 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: A question of NDR > > > Scenario: > > mailbox1 has "user" permission against mailbox2. > mailbox1 sends messages from within mailbox1 with "mailbox2" in From > field. Any subsequent NDR's appear in Inbox of mailbox1 and not > mailbox2. > > > qué arriba con eso? > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]