It sounds as though you may have softened your opinion on moving the servers
to separate domains prior to transitioning over to E2K.

Is this correct, or am I reading too much into your statement below?

Nate 

> ----------
> From:         Ed Crowley
> Reply To:     Exchange Discussions
> Sent:         Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:31
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:      RE: E5.5 -> E2K migration question  - Moving servers to new
> domai ns.
> 
> Continuing to use multiple sites (administrative groups) makes sense as
> a transitional step because it's easiest to migrate a site to a new
> administrative group.  Once you're in native mode, you can then migrate
> mailboxes between administrative groups, which eases the burden of
> consolidating to a smaller number of them.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
> Tech Consultant
> hp Services
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: E5.5 -> E2K migration question - Moving servers to new
> domai ns.
> 
> 
> From a technical perspective then there should be no issues. The FAQ has
> detailed instructions on making that change.
> 
> I'd still argue that the complexity of adding domains and continuing to
> use multiple sites should be reconsidered, however.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:31 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: E5.5 -> E2K migration question - Moving servers 
> > to new domai ns.
> > 
> > 
> > Good point Roger.  I should have given more information as to
> > the sites.
> > The four servers are in fact in four separate sites.  So the 
> > following is
> > more accurate:
> > 
> > Currently in DOMAIN A
> >  
> >       SERVER A              SITE A
> >       SERVER B              SITE B
> >       SERVER C              SITE C
> >       SERVER D              SITE D
> >  
> > After the move
> >  
> >       SERVER A              DOMAIN A                SITE A
> >       SERVER B              DOMAIN B                SITE B
> >       SERVER C              DOMAIN C                SITE C
> >       SERVER D              DOMAIN D                SITE D
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:55 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: E5.5 -> E2K migration question - Moving servers 
> > to new domai
> > ns.
> > 
> > 
> > Other than they're creating more domains? Not really.
> > 
> > I'd suggest being very clear on the downsides and
> > manageability issues of
> > multiple domain configurations anyway.
> > 
> > The biggest issue, as I see it, depends on whether or not the
> > boxes are in
> > the same or different Exchange sites. If they're in the same 
> > site, it will
> > work but it will be ugly. If its 4 sites, then it should be easy.
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > Atlanta, GA
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 AM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: E5.5 -> E2K migration question - Moving servers to
> > > new domains.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > One of the Admins in charge of migrating one of our customers over 
> > > to E2K had a question regarding moving some existing E5.5 servers to
> > > new domains
> > > prior to migration over to E2K so as to minimize replication. 
> > >  I can't think
> > > of anything that would indicate this would be a problem, but 
> > > I figured I
> > > would run this by the list to be sure.
> > > 
> > > Scenario -
> > > 
> > > Current environment - 4 E5.5 servers with SP4 (NT 4.x with
> > > SP6a) running in
> > > one domain (DOMAIN A let's call it).
> > > 
> > > For the purposes of migration they want to move three servers into 
> > > three existing domains.  Each of these domains has a two way trust
> > > with DOMAIN A.
> > > 
> > > In short what will happen is this.
> > > 
> > > Currently in DOMAIN A
> > > 
> > >      SERVER A
> > >      SERVER B
> > >      SERVER C
> > >      SERVER D
> > > 
> > > After the move
> > > 
> > >      SERVER A             DOMAIN A
> > >      SERVER B             DOMAIN B
> > >      SERVER C             DOMAIN C
> > >      SERVER D             DOMAIN D
> > > 
> > > Can anyone suggest a reason why this would NOT be a good idea?
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Nate Couch
> > > EDS Messaging
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to