For anyone running the beta, does it feel like the system requirements are
going to be a lot steeper then for Exchange 2000?

I'm running Exchange 2000 on a dual PPro 200 Compaq server, and I'd love not
to have to get new hardware.

Thanks,
Erick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Ault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:34 PM
Subject: Exchange2003


> http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/topten.asp
>
> Anyone hankerin' to upgrade?
>
>
> Tim.
> x3683
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:24 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: calendar, tasks and contacts
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a really weird one here folks:
>
> This afternoon one of the users noticed that his contact list included
some
> names that he did not know. These contacts were discovered to be a
> duplication of a contacts folder in another persons mailbox. The same
thing
> has happened for the calendar and task folders.
>
> I have Symantec AV & Filtering on the exchange server, with Trend running
at
> the SMTP gateway... so I am fairly well protected and there has been no
> other suspicious activity to suggest viral infection.
>
> Infact, we tried deleting a contact from one users contact folder
(thinking
> the folder may erroneously be linked in the IS). The contact was deleted
> from one users folder, but remained in the original owners contacts
folder.
>
> I am pretty sure the users haven't copied these contacts manually. I have
> investigated the exchange server event logs to see if there was an IS
> corruption or something but the most serious thing I have in the logs is
> about missing user SID's.
>
> I am runnning exchange 2000 Sp3 on win2k SP3.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas? Should I just schedule to run isinteg?
>
> Thanks,
> MP
>
> "This message and any attachment to it is intended for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed by the first sender and
> contains information which may be confidential and/or privileged.
>
> If you receive this message and any attachment in error, please delete it
> immediately and notify the sender by electronic mail or telephone (61 2)
> 9211 0188. Unless you have been expressly authorised by the sender, you
are
> prohibited from copying, distributing or using the information contained
in
> this message and any attachment.
>
> Tab Limited (ABN 17 081 765 308) is not responsible for any changes made
to
> this message or any attachment other than those made by Tab Limited, or
for
> the effect of changes made by others on the meaning of this message and
any
> attachment.
>
> Tab Limited does not represent that any attachment is free from computer
> viruses or defects and the user assumes all responsibility for any loss,
> damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any
> attachment."
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to