We just bought the new shark, havent done anything with it yet though. Sorry to hear about the fat-t woes.
-----Original Message----- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAN Recommendations We are currently using the FastT700 for our SAN and have had alot of problems with it. We are having .5 to 1 second Read and Write times on the drives and the Disk Queue has been very high. They just replaced the entire system this week-end and it helped alittle but not much. I would just be carefull. I am going to run DiskPar tonight and see if that helps. I will let you know. -----Original Message----- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAN Recommendations Ess 800? Or f30/20? -----Original Message----- From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SAN Recommendations We are using IBM Shark with Exchange 5.5 without any issues. Elizabeth Thompson Service and Support Technician CCBC - Catonsville -----Original Message----- From: Mark Puchalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SAN Recommendations In preparation for our migration to Exchange 2000, we are working on choosing a SAN to place behind the clustered Exchange servers. We will also be moving various other application and file servers to the SAN as time goes on. Our current data center standard is Dell PowerEdge servers running a mix of NetWare 5.1/6 and Windows NT4/2000. We are looking at the Dell|EMC CX400 and CX600 SANs. In addition to these models, a consultant has proposed the IBM FAStT700 SAN. I'd be interested in getting feedback on performance, service, reliability, etc. from anyone running either of these SANs. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------- Mark A. Puchalski Network Engineer Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP Office: 313.465.7167 Fax: 313.465.8267 ********************************************************************* Confidential: This electronic message and all contents contain information from the law firm of Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP which may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately (313.465.7000) and destroy the original message and all copies. ********************************************************************* _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
