I'm not sure that 2Gigs is much of a "limit" is it? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
> > -----Original Message----- > From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Speaking of mailbox limits...is there a limit to the mailbox > limit you can set on your Private Information store for Send > and Send and Receive ? Mine doens't allow anything above > 2097151 KB. Any ideas ? > Exchange 5.5 SP4 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > Hey you could reverse the logic here and use this as an > important point about mail box limits > > cool > thanks > bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our > sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer > to be contacted directly by a "delegate" than have to send a > second message to an address they got out of an OOO. > > Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of > enabling OOO to the Internet. > > I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the > VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet > for that reason among other's. > > Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one > when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary "reply to > every message" rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply > mailbox and the two exchanged "unique" > messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. > > Darcy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: OOO to internet, still bad? > > > I strongly discourage it in our firm. Usually the most > effective argument against for me has been spam -- we all > know that it's a bad idea to reply to spammers confirming > that your address is legitimate. Throw OOO on somebody's > account and I suspect that their spam load will significantly > increase in the weeks and months ahead as they get added to > every spammer's "Gold List" of valid e-mail addresses. > > There are also security issues and the occasional technical > reason not to do it. Instead what we recommend people do is > turn on their secretary's account as an alternate recipient > while they are away and the secretary is instructed to handle > any crucial issues that come up, including notifying > legitimate correspondants, if any, that the person is out of > the office and will reply when they return. > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:34 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. > > Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any "best-practices" > > available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service > > effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid > pitfalls in > > the past? > > > > How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? > > > > Thx for ideas... byron > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ======================================================= > This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not > the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the > information within this email or its attachments. If you have > received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. > ======================================================= > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
