Woohoo! High-5! Yo're looking great today, by the way.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange > You are preaching to the choir William. Data which requires the highest > levels of security should be administered by admins who have the requisite > clearance levels and who are kept in cages during their off hours. > > On 4/3/03 18:57, "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Particularly? No. > > > > Are you requiring inbound email to be encrypted as well? > > > > I can also capture keystrokes of remote computers of unsuspecting users > > among other lame methods. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:53 PM > > Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange > > > > > >> A decentralized PGP implementation (a generally bad idea... and imperfect > > at > >> best ) doesn't particularly does it? > >> > >> On 4/3/03 18:36, "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> All these solutions still require an element of trust in an > > administrator. > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM > >>> Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange > >>> > >>> > >>>> Start with the NSA whitepapers and other best practices for securing > >>>> Exchange. www.neuronactive.com has links to the NSA whitepapers and a > >>> number > >>>> of other good security resources. Look at Paul Robichaux's book and at > >>> KMS. > >>>> Then spend some significant time researching the pros and cons of a > >>> solution > >>>> like PGP. Finally, engage MCS's government consulting unit (or similar > >>> unit > >>>> from $one_of_a_few_consulting _shops) to discuss the implementations > > used > >>>> for DMS. > >>>> > >>>> On 4/3/03 16:28, "Orin Rehorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for > >>> high > >>>>> security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if > >>> even > >>>>> the admin couldn't see their e-mails. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Orin > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
