Let me think of an appropriate response: "get stuffed". Your analogy is inane and irrelevant.
I'm describing a real-world situation - he's lost the server a couple of times; he's never lost data. Why should he spend the extra cash for a backup solution that he wouldn't use? [1] [1] Disclaimer: He burns data files to CD-R & CD-RW at appropriate intervals. Mail that is contractual in nature tends to end up in paper files; he uses Exchange as an MTA and a calendar tool, not as a document and data repository. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:20 To: Exchange Discussions On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, at 3:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > He doesn't take daily backups, and is fully aware that if there's a > problem, to copy the OST's to PST's, etc. He's never lost a single > piece of data. ... and I know people who don't ware their seatbelts because they've "never been in an accident". -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
