Nope - that's just Andy. Up there with Martin & Ed as far as I am concerned when it comes to knowing their stuff.
themolk. > -----Original Message----- > From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2003 8:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > > > Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have > you remembered it word for word?!!!! > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy > Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > > > "+" is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the > specification in RFC2821 of "atext" as the fundamental atom > of the local part of the address and then definition of atext > in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT / "!" / "#" / > "$" / "%" / "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / "=" / "?" / > "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~" > > The "+" character in some mailers indicates a special > function, but only during local delivery, not routing. > ======================================== > ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm > ======================================== > > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM > Posted To: Microsoft Exchange > Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > > A "+" has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x > should not even let you create that. > > William > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Douglas, Josh D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM > Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters > > > > Group, > > > > we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox > method. > > I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. > Everything > that > > I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site > name. We > > have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names, > mailboxes, > > dl's. We did have an & at our organization level and my boss is > worried > > about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find > anything on > the > > web that mentions anything other than organization and site name. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > thanks > > Josh Douglas > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=& lang=english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
