The old Exchange box is a relic, it's going one way or the other and I wouldn't use it for solitare at this point. This whole discussion arouse when I put together a request for a new Exchange server. I don't think I am going to be able to win the argument to keep them separate. The SQL server was overkill to begin with now I'm going to have to live with SQL and Exchange on one box. I was looking for known software related issues that might help me with my argument but I couldn't find any. Thanks for the help, Scott.
> Move Exchange to this box, move SQL to the old Exchange server? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 11:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange and SQL > > We have an SQL 2000 server with quad processors, 4 gigs of ram, and 3 raid > configurations with about 200 gb of hd space that's basically being used > to run a 2 gb database for about 20 users that will never grow. My boss > thinks we should move our exchange 5.5 server (about 120 users) to this > box (going to Exchange 2000 in a few months) because it's not being > utilized fully. Other than the "if we lose SQL we lose Exchange" theory, > why else is this a bad idea? Thanks in advance, Scott. > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang > =english > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
