I got the same problem on one server. Nt4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. Server runs fine for 2 days then store.exe pegs at 100%. Server is not at my location So I don't know if I want to turn maint off
-----Original Message----- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe pegging the processor Try downloading the Process Explorer from the http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp.shtml and see if you can find more information about Store.exe process. I am not sure if it will or not, but you never know. Also, there's security fix, Exchange Server 5.5 Post-SP4 RPC Fixes which will replace many files including the Store.exe on your Exchange server. You can look at the Q304062 article for more info. Or you can run the Security Analyzer to see what you need. After applying SP, it's good idea to re-optimze your Exchange server again. Brian -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Haines Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe pegging the processor Hello all... need some help with an issue. here's my scenario exchange 5.5 sp4 in a 2 site organization: The store.exe has recently starting pegging the processor. It almost looks like online maintenance is not releasing the store.exe after it has completed. We also run sybari antigen 7.5 for exchange server. So i've: 1. disabled antigen and unhooked its services 2. searched the queues for any bouncing messages (mta size limit is 5.5mb and imc size limit is 5.5mb) 3. reapplied service pack 4 4. run isinteg -fix -priv -test alltests 5. run isinteg -fix -pub -test alltests Now with that being said... I did recently have a corrupt calendar on the server in the other site that replicates free/busy to the problem server. The corrupt calendar has been deleted but the other server is still getting pegged. (i know that's quite a reach) I dont have a backup with recent enough info to do a restore and I'd like to avoid eseutil /p. Im wondering if I should do on an offline defrag to create a new database structure???? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks!! ************************************************************************ *** The information contained in this message is intended only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or any agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately. SMG reserves the right to monitor and review all content sent to and from this email address. Messages sent to and from this address may be stored on the SMG email system. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
