Sorry I thought you were saying that you had send 6 *same* tests and the
6th one got through

I keep trying to remember something from a while ago... something about
the usage of the % sign in e-mail addresses, like there was a bug in
software and there was a fix for it, but I am not sure if it was when I
worked with Exchange or Imail...

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lost in relay problem

here is 5 6 and 7.  they seem same to me.  sorry i got the numbering
wrong,
i'm sure this is lack of understanding on my part, my ims ques are
seeing
thousands of ndr's


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<< 250 OK - Reset 
>>>> MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
>>>> RCPT TO:                                          <---- good 
<<< 550 Relaying is prohibited                         <---- good

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<< 250 OK - Reset 
>>>> MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
>>>> RCPT TO:                                          <---- good
<<< 550 Relaying is prohibited                         <---- good

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<< 250 OK - Reset 
>>>> MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
>>>> RCPT TO: 
<<< 250 OK - Recipient                                 <---- good
>>>> DATA                                              <---- bad!
<<< 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 
>>>> MESSAGE
<<< 250 OK 

-----Original Message-----
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lost in relay problem


#6 doesn't look exactly like the previous 5, specifically the To line.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: lost in relay problem


exch 5.5 w/sp4

First let me say i am sorry, cause i keep comming back and asking this.
I
MUST be missing something or just plai stupid, time to quit and go flip
burgers.  We have a mail server that is 5.5 smtp bridgehead (
12.10.133.30 )
and in routing restrictions have hosts and clients checked.  

Using the following test http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ when
i
send it to myself [EMAIL PROTECTED] it WORKS and the email gets to me
with
the following...


<<< 220 postoffice02.aruplab.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange
Internet
Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready 
>>>> HELO staff.iinet.net.au 
<<< 250 OK 

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
>>>> RCPT TO: 
<<< 250 OK - Recipient 
>>>> DATA 
<<< 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 
>>>> MESSAGE
<<< 250 OK 
SUCCESS

Relay Accepted - final response code 250


Now if i change the TO address to a generic [EMAIL PROTECTED] address
that I
have setup, some other smtp recipent then my own it fails 5 times then
suddenly works on the 6th, however the mail doesnt ever deliver.  per
the
follwing...

+5 of these

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<< 250 OK - Reset 
>>>> MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
>>>> RCPT TO: 
<<< 550 Relaying is prohibited

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<< 250 OK - Reset 
>>>> MAIL FROM: 
<<< 250 OK - mail from 
>>>> RCPT TO: 
<<< 250 OK - Recipient 
>>>> DATA 
<<< 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF 
>>>> MESSAGE
<<< 250 OK 
SUCCESS



In senario 2 I dont see how it can do a RCPT TO: and 550 - to - RCPT TO:
250
OK - Recipent.  SO I AM CONFUSED ALL TO HELL.  Is it like "try this five
times and on six it will work?  And even if in senario 2 sending it to
another server it never delivers doesnt it still sit on my server and
eat up
cpu/memory/disk?  

In senario 1 if the message is "relayed" to my server and to my clients
it
works right off the bat??!!  i dont see how that is denying relaying?
Doesnt that just open a huge window for asia-pacifica to spam my
clients?
Is there a way to plug this?

sorry but i've made this so complex in my head it hurts.

much thanks
e-  

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to