I really do like the Exchange 5.5 X.400 connector for intersite messaging, don't get me wrong. But it is harder to grasp for some so I simply suggested he test an alternative.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K Hmmmmm... SMTP in 5.5 was not that great though. It was not native and messages had to be translated from native (X.400-like) format to SMTP and back. Depending on the volume of mail, it might not be pleasant. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -----Original Message----- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K I said "might". SMTP worked pretty good in 5.5 for this. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K Even in a mixed environment? He's got a 5.5 box there still -------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K > > > Still, in Exchange 2000 you're probably just as well off with SMTP. > You might try both and see which works best for you. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davinder > Gupta > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:22 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K > > Link speed/latency limitations. > > Davinder > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K > > Yes, but what reasoning would you have for just using an X.400 > connector? > Because it has a lot of limitations that's why I ask. > > _________________ > John Bowles > Exchange Engineer > OIG/HHS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davinder > Gupta > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K > > > Hi Guys, > > Can an Exchange 5.5 connector (x.400) in one exchange site talk to > another connector (x.400) connector in Exchange 2K? > > Thanks > Davinder > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t ext_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
