So, on the upper end (say 5000 active mailboxes), the resource requirements are not much changed.
But yes, the minimums on the lower-end have gone up. I don't think MSFT published those numbers though. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 11:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: Exchange 2016 I've noticed the resource requirements appear higher than the previous release. The usability of OWA is much improved as well... jlc ________________________________ From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Steve Ens <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: November 9, 2015 9:37 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: Exchange 2016 CU1 is close too from what I've seen...but not quite baked. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM Michael B. Smith <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Just wait until cu1 is out. It'll clear up a lot of these little anomalies. Until then - just play with it. Don't have high expectations. :-) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 11:00 AM To: '[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>' Subject: [Exchange] Exchange 2016 I labbed up an instance of 2016 to take a look and while everything went as expected I noticed the diagnostic service throws an uncountable # of exceptions and crashes often. I find it hard to imagine all of those are accidental, such as accessing a file that does not exist without checking and/or wrapping this up in some kind of error handling. Its rather shocking that it crashes so often? Anyone else notice this? jlc
