RE: 5.5 Raid Config (more Info)

[Joe Casale]

No doubt, the perf advantages of NTFS, and the reliability, and automated features of NTFS make it the choice EVERYWHERE. You can boot dos, and read and write ntfs now anyway if you had to! Fat is gone! jlc   -----Original Message----- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:46 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 Raid Config (more Info)   FAT is sooooooo 90's.     -----Original Message----- From: Gary Wheaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 Raid Config (more Info) P.S. FAT for System, NTFS for LOG and DATA. -----Original Message----- From: Micciche Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 5.5 Raid Config (more Info) That's what I'm going with.  Thanks a lot Gary.   List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm