Why use dial-up?
If you trust the company enough to dial-up to it. Why not do an IMC--->IMC connection. All that is needed is a known password on both ends that both admins share and can be specific to this IMC instance so they aren't giving away any secrets. I've done that many times at other companies. It works very well.
I can't seem to locate the Q article for reference. But there is one. I've seen it.
-Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bodnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 7:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange: 9215 error
Exchange 5.5 SP2
NT 4.0 SP6a
We have an X.400 connector setup over dial-up with one of our vendors and
they are telling us that over the last 2 weeks they have been experiencing
a
problem where the connection seems to be terminating abnormally and the
messages are transferred to our system, but backing up on their system,
because they are not receiving a confirmation that the messages have been
transferred. I have found a number of articles that seem very similar. The
one that most closely describes our situation is Q193380. But the only
Event
ID associated with this on our Exchange server is 9215. The relevant KB
articles referencing 9215 are:
Q170056
Q154301
Q164400
Q182619
Q261251
But none seem to really pertain to this situation. I am considering going
to
SP4, but I found mention of a similar error that only manifests itself
with
SP3 or 4. So I am a little leery of doing this on a production server.
Has anyone come across this before?
TIA
Chris Bodnar
The Lehigh Group
610-966-9702 X:134
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
