Errr.. MS only started in the email business because of a little product called Network Courier! Most people didn't trust that when it started and CCMail was the product of choice for most businesses. The tables can turn and it depends on how badly Oracle (or whoever) wants that business.
Kevin -----Original Message----- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 21:08 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Ellison must take a tour of Compaq and see how they have on the average 2500 users per their exchange. We as the second largest ..... have on the average 1900 users per exchange server and the only time that they anyone has been down was because of HD failure. However we have Oracle consultants every week working on our 6.4 Tetra Byte database which keeps crashing. Would one really trust a company that has just started into email business? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:18 AM Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange > On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote: > > 3) They both will require competent administrators to function well > > I've found *anything* requires a competent administrator to function well. > > -- > Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | > | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | > | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm