Speakin of CareBear... William doesn't run that list. "Consulting: If you're not part of the solution, there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem"
-----Original Message----- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defragging the IS ROFL....William!!! -----Original Message----- From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defragging the IS Don't really call me slow - I might have to go to the carebear list that William runs. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -----Original Message----- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defragging the IS OK, what would be a more realistic estimate then? I'd like to be able to give them some idea. -----Original Message----- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 1:49 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Defragging the IS Don't do a defrag for a measly 16MB! 2-3 hours for a 36GB IS!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggghhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttttt. D "Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others." -----Original Message----- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Defragging the IS Tomorrow we are scheduled to move our single server Exchange 5.5 site over to a new Compaq DL380 server that is part of a SAN. Old server is NT4, SP6. New server will be Windows 2000, SP2 but will still have Exchange 5.5, SP4. My boss wants us do a complete backup of the server tonight, then come in tomorrow and do a defrag of the database, back it up again, and restore it to the new server. It seems to be the general consensus on this list that defrag=bad. But what about in this situation where we are moving to a new server and we are scheduled to have the server down for 24 hours anyway? I checked the event logs and, as of last night it shows that the database has 16 megabytes of free space after online defragmentation. Is this the "white space" that I've heard about? And is that all the space we will gain by doing a defrag? If that's the case, I will suggest we don't take the time and risk of doing a defrag of the IS. I'm guessing it will take at least 2-3 hours to defrag our 36GB database???? Or will there be a performance increase by doing a defrag now? Thanks for your input. Tim List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm