Re: PST Bad - why?

[Missy Koslosky]

Title: RE: PST Bad - why?

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm tells all you need to know on the subject... ----- Original Message ----- From: Lesaca, Wally R. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:48 AM Subject: RE: PST Bad - why? Please elaborate more on the issue. I'm also in a dilemma. My users are hard headed when it comes to mailbox size. One way is to go .PST. My disk space is now only 560k. TIA. -----Original Message----- From:   Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:05 PM To:     MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:        RE: PST Bad - why? PST=BAD is a bad equation. It should be PST=Usually Bad. Sometimes, you don't have any choice. For instance, when doing migrations or moving mailboxes. However, generally you shouldn't use them for permanent storage. They are actually very similar to the old MSMail format for storing mail which was also prone to failure. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Yurchuk, Michael W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 17:36 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: PST Bad - why? Hello all sorry to ask a stupid question, but my pointy haired boss is looking at implementing PST's here and I know many people say pst's are not good, could you guys give me some ammo to argue why PST's aren't a good option and what problems will end up occurring if it is implemented. Thanks in advance. Michael Yurchuk, MCSE Systems Administrator direcTEL Saskatoon, SK 306-384-8600 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm