Correction: The policy is applying to the mailboxes that do not have a problem. The policy is not applying to mailboxes that are accounts that named after the users first name.
I confirmed this by adding a bogus SMTP address to the policy. This is very peculiar... -- Micheal Espinola Jr "Micheal Espinola Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:261394@exchangelist... > > Yep, there is only 1 DGAL. > > These mailboxes were imported over a week ago. > > Since my original post, I deleted and manually recreated on of the > mailboxes. I noticed that even after waiting overnight, the Default > Recipient Policy was not applied (thus it was never config'd for any > addresses). > > I tried to manually apply the policy, but it does not seem to be taking > effect. I am currently searching for info on how/why/if the recipients no > longer fall within the scope of that default policy. > > Any ideas? Thanks! > -- > Micheal Espinola Jr > > > "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:261281@exchangelist... > > > > In Exchange System Manader, is there only the default global address > > list available? > > > > Were these users mailboxes just created? Has the RUS had a chance to > > update? > > > > William > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:22 PM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Lotus -> Exchange 2K mailboxes missing from GAL > > > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > I am assisting a client's migration from Lotus R5 to Exchange 2K. I > > have successfully migrated from Lotus to Exchange 5.5 in the past, so I > > am not completely walking blind here. I also have the 3-CD Migration > > Tools and Resources kits from MS at my fingertips. > > > > The migration has been completed (sorta) and was seemingly without > > error. Until I noticed something peculiar: > > > > A select number of users mailboxes are hidden from the GAL. However, > > they do not have the "Hide from address book" option selected on their > > accounts. And, without being visible to the GAL, I cant configure them > > for Outlook. > > > > These users have account/mailbox names that match their first name (i.e. > > first name - not first initial, last name). This was done prior to my > > assistance on this matter, and was the original naming convention for > > the company. > > > > >From what I can ascertain via the Active Directory Users and Computers > > >MMC, > > the accounts and mailbox configurations are correct, and are identical > > to the remaining accounts (which use the FI, LN convention) that are > > visible in the GAL. > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! I'm stumped... > > -- > > Micheal Espinola Jr > > > > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
