Hmmm, so I'll assume you don't use ArcServe? > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:05 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Clustering > > There are third party product that claim success in this. > > And there is no way anything from CA is going on my servers. Funny how > they had to change the name of the product called SurviveIT. > > -----Original Message----- > From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:12 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Clustering > > > Here is an article that about software that replicates from one server > to the other for exchange. So that would take care of the store problem. > > http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=24890 > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:44 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Clustering > > Oh yes.... Beat that puppy to virtual death in a past life. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:37 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Clustering > > > You forgot another single point of failure - there is one quorum drive. > > -- > Matt Lathrum > General Dynamics Decision Systems > When cryptography is outlawed, > bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:22 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Clustering > > As Kevin mentioned, there is still a single point of failure - there is > only one information store. No matter how many cluster nodes, > corruption in the store is not fault tolerant. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:08 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Clustering > > > Exchange fault tolerance basically > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:09 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Clustering > > We would not recommend it. More issues and you still have a > single point > of failure. > > What are you wanting to achieve? > > --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond > http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:02 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Clustering > > > Would the list recommend clustering of exchange servers or too > many > issues with this? Too difficult to setup? > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
