I think it's going to depend on how the WS is configured, particularly that
little checkbox that says "Use DNS for WINS resolution".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:28 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5
> 
> 
> Can anyone elaborate on how that works on an NT 4 domain? 
> WINS is correct
> and a conflicting DNS entry is there? Why does DNS take 
> precedence on an NT4
> domain? I thought that was a 2K thing??? (I am sending this 
> to the NT list
> so stop barking)
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Note on moving Exch 5.5
> 
> 
> Well I found something. There was still a DNS entry for the 
> old IP address.
> I originally intended to make it separate and make it mail2 
> or something
> similar in DNS. I removed the entry and it has cleared most 
> of my problems.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:58 AM
> Subject: Note on moving Exch 5.5
> 
> 
> As we have been discussing, I moved my mail server this past weekend.
> 
> A note on a blip I experienced:
> 
> I changed the internal IP on the new server to match the old 
> server's IP (I
> gave the old one a completely different IP) after moving 
> mailboxes so that I
> would not have to mess with router settings and such for the 
> NAT. It worked
> fine, because the DNS was still correct, mail came through, etc.
> 
> On Monday, when people started Outlook and it looked for the new mail
> server, some users had issues with the new IP. They were 
> trying to resolve
> to the old IP. I blew out WINS and it still looked for the 
> old POC. A well
> meaning coworker added an LMHOSTS entry for the server (GOD 
> NOOOOOOOOOO).
> Bad form, but it worked at that moment, which is all users 
> seem to care
> about.
> 
> I plan to go back and fix this issue when things settle down.
> 
> I just wanted to bring this up for posterity's sake. *wink
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to