I take that back. I shouldn't claim with certainty that it has nothing to do with SPF, but: I've never seen an SPF related error that did not in one way or another say that it related to SPF or SenderID specifically.
Based on that, I would not go forward with SPF truobleshooting, and instead I would contact the receiving domain to confirm *why* the rejection took place. On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David, the error that you clipped had nothing to do with SPF. > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:49 PM, David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Where do I check my SPF records? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:40 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Rejected Email > > > > Check to be sure your own SPF records are in order, and contact the > > email administrator at that domain and find out what it is about those > > emails his server doesn't like. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:24 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Rejected Email > > > > I have users that just started reporting this very issue this week! What > > does this mean I need to do? > > ------------------ > > The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report > > a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, > > contact your system administrator. > > < outbound4-sin-R.bigfish.com #5.0.0 X-Postfix; host > > mailgate.vanderbilt.edu[129.59.4.20] said: 550 5.7.0 > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Local Policy Violation (in reply to MAIL > > FROM command)> > > ----------------------------- > > > > Dave Lum - Systems Engineer > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (971)-222-1025 > > "When you step on the brakes your life is in your foot's hands" > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:33 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Rejected Email > > > > SenderID PRA: That's a reference to SPF records. "not permitted" > > tells me that the likely issue is that the sending source and the what > > is allowed in the SPF record to not match. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Brown, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > We are continually having Newsletters rejected because of the > > anti-spoofing > > > features on our Edge Transports. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have placed the IP address of the sending server AND of the domain > > of the > > > return address in the IP Allow List. Frankly, I don't know what else > > to do > > > to get these newsletters in to our domain. (This isn't something I > > need to > > > restart the Transport Service for, is it?) > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is the relevant part of one log entry from the Agent Logs: > > > > > > 4,Sender Id Agent,OnEndOfHeaders,RejectMessage,550 5.7.1 Sender ID > > (PRA) Not > > > Permitted,Fail_NotPermitted, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are running Exchange 2007, CCR with two Edge transports. We have > > NOT > > > upgraded to SP1 yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry C. Brown > > > > > > LAN/WAN CS Support > > > > > > Dayton Power & Light > > > > > > (937)-331-4922 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ME2 > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > ************************************************************************ > > ************************** > > Note: > > The information contained in this message may be privileged and > > confidential and > > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the > > intended > > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this > > message to > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > > > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If > > you > > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately > > by > > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. > > ************************************************************************ > > ************************** > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > > > -- > ME2 > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
