It's = yo mama is
Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Xobni released It's an old joke From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:15 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Xobni released "Now, I need cached mode for OWA." Come again? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 May 2008 05:02 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Xobni released >>xobni is not that much different then enabling Instant search on an outlook client is it? functionality-wise? not too much different. Xobni does not index calendar, contacts, etc. though. performance-wise? I stopped using instant search for messages months ago. Now, I need cached mode for OWA. _____ From: "Administrator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 7:57 PM To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com> Subject: RE: Xobni released Not sure about that indexing thought, xobni is not that much different then enabling Instant search on an outlook client is it? All it has to do is make a local index file... Cached mode has lots of advantages and a few disadvantages, one deploying it in an organization with high change can lead to offline address book issues at the best of times. I am a big advocate of cached mode but understanding its sweet spot and where best to leverage and when to use online mode can help in the deployment and to the end user experience greatly... -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Xobni released Only works with cached mode? That's a stellar selling point. Really. If it were to index an Exchange box directly, that would be a very bad thing - bring it to its knees, if more than one or two users used it. Pity the fools who ban cached mode. That's their problem, not mine. On 5/5/08, Administrator wrote: > > > > Only problem I have seen is that Xobni only works with cached mode and some > organizations have a policy to not use cached mode... > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:21 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Xobni released > > > > This is one of the few Outlook add-ins I would actually pay for. > > I can get Outlook to max out CPU on its own. I can't seem to get Xobni to > do so. I am going to test your public folder issue later today. > > Gmail is still 'beta'. :P > > ________________________________ > > > From: "Carl Houseman" > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 10:56 AM > To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" > > Subject: RE: Xobni released > > This is still a beta and still acts like one. > > > > The previous beta I tried marked messages in public folders as read when > they weren't. > > > > This one locked up Outlook @ 100% CPU in less than 5 minutes of poking at > it. Didn't even get to see if they'd fixed the marked-as-read problem. > > > > I'll try it again when the word beta has been banished... > > > > > > > From: Matt Lathrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:15 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Xobni released > > > > Xobni was released publicly today: > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/technology/05xobni.html?_r=1&oref=slog in > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
