Thanks Michael. Mine would be to move off to a clean AD environment and for a bit of administrative separation.
- John Barsodi From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Implement new AD Forest(Resource forest) for Exchange 2007 for a Exchange 2k/2k3 transition I know a couple of companies that have done this, several large ones. I wasn't involved in it though. The couple that I've seen do it are because of SLD issues. See: http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/04/04/exchang e-2007-and-domain-rename.aspx and http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2008/04/03/wrappin g-up-slds-and-exchange-server-2007.aspx That being said, many of the earlier reasons for doing so (that still apply) are based on separation of security and responsibility. Exchange and Active Directory are inextricably linked. It's difficult (not impossible, just difficult) to have people responsible for one who are not responsible for the other. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Implement new AD Forest(Resource forest) for Exchange 2007 for a Exchange 2k/2k3 transition Has anyone performed an Exchange 2007 transition to a Resource from their current AD forest with Exchange 2000/2003? Just curious if anyone has done this yet and what challenges did you encounter? What factors came into play when deciding to implement this way? Thanks, - John Barsodi ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
