Created a new mailbox store, tried to move my own mailbox, got the following:
- <summary isWarning="false" errorCode="0xc1050000"> The information store could not be opened. The MAPI provider failed. MAPI 1.0 ID no: 8004011d-0289-00000000 I'm currently moving the Message Journaling mailbox, so I have to wonder what the issue was. I'll try mine again after that finishes successfully - if it does. Kurt On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK, it's per mailbox store. Not per SG. > > Regards, > > Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP > My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael > Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:56 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: E2k3 and Event ID 9666 from MSExchangeIS > > Ouch. > > OK - I'm looking at the technet article, and it says "create a new > mailbox database" > > Is that done at the server level, or at the storage group level? As > you might guess, I have no training... > > Context menu at the server level asks to start a new Storage Group. > Context menu at the Storage Group level asks to start a new Mailbox > Store. I assume that I want the latter - a new Mailbox Store within > the Storage Group, but would like confirmation. > > Also, I have a Message Journaling mailbox on the original store. > Should I leave it there? Should a create yet another store and move it > to that, then point all of the message journaling to that? > > Kurt > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Michael B. Smith > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Mailstore will dismount. Pretty significant. >> >> Regards, >> >> Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP >> My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael >> Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:28 PM >> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >> Subject: Re: E2k3 and Event ID 9666 from MSExchangeIS >> >> Lovely. >> >> What's the impact if the limit is hit? I'm trying to patch my servers >> right now... >> >> Kurt >> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Michael B. Smith >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Go ahead and bump the limit to 16K. >>> >>> Create a new store and move all your mailboxes. That will set the limit > on >>> the new mailstore at zero. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP >>> My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael >>> Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:49 PM >>> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues >>> Subject: E2k3 and Event ID 9666 from MSExchangeIS >>> >>> I've just noticed this event in my logs, and it looks pretty serious, >>> but I can't find the KB article most people cite: 820379 >>> >>> I've found http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495.aspx, >>> but don't know just how concerned I should be. >>> >>> Text of the event is: >>> >>> The number of named properties created for database "First Storage >>> Group\Mailbox Store (XCH)" is close to quota limit. >>> Current number of named properties: 8190 >>> Quota limit for named properties: 8192 >>> User attempting to create the named property: "SYSTEM" >>> Named property GUID: 00020386-0000-0000-c000-000000000046 >>> Named property name/id: "X-MS-WT" >> >> >> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ >> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ >> > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
