Ex2k7 is stricter when it comes to RFCs Mutlipart/related is probably being used in Content-Type rather than multipart/mixed
Mutlipart/related is usually used for html body with inline images for which a paperclip will not be shown since inline images are part of the body (of course that brings up the argument of whether inline images are really attachments or not) Anyway, its a strict interpetation of RFC 2387 A good rule of thumb to follow is that Ex2k3 is much looser in rfc interpetation than E12 as I'm sure we are all painfully discovering So stuff that "worked" for better or worse in Ex2k3 no longer does in E12 On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Jason Gurtz <jasongu...@npumail.com> wrote: >> I have a strange issue after upgrading to Exchange 2007 where users are >> not getting the paperclip icon on internal mail although there is an >> attachment there. > > Does <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/961940> seem to apply? Would be > interesting if you could view it in OWA. > > Something does seem to be amiss because the names of the inline attached > images in the very message I'm replying to don't seem to be right > (image910c62....@11e82c6e.052547fa for example). Both David's and > Michael's quoted replies seem to have "fixed" the naming somehow > (image001.jpg for example) so MIMEField seems suspect. > > ~JasonG > > -- > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
