Is there anyone that has any ideas?
_____ From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk] Sent: 20 March 2009 03:02 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Smart Host vs SMTP connector Presumably, I can just remove the new server as a member of the existing routing group and that will force the server to use the smart host on the smtp virtual server Is this the best way or should I be creating an additional smtp connector just for this server and specify the address spaces that are being used for this server? _____ From: John Stevens [mailto:j...@js-internet.co.uk] Sent: 20 March 2009 02:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Smart Host vs SMTP connector Folks I have installed an additional Exchange 2003 server into our environment for a specific role of mailboxes that will be created on this server will have a completely different smtp address and inbound and outbound routing of mail will go via a separate link. i.e. via a third party who are doing some filtering and AV/Content/Spam scanning etc I have created an additional recipient policy and set the filter to pick up users created on this new server. However, regarding the routing of the outbound mail, I don't want it to use the SMTP connector that is already installed for the other servers in the existing routing group. I want to ensure that it passes outbound through the to the third party server. Would I just add the fqdn or IP address in the smart host on the smtp virtual server on this new server or will the SMTP connector over-ride it and take precedence. I have read somewhere that it does. Can anyone explain the best way forward for this? Thanks John ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
