Hi all, Can I please ask does Exchange list itself as "Version 8.2" once SP2 has been installed (in Server properties or Help, About Exchange Server 2007)?
Thanks, Andrew 2009/12/16 Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com> > OK, I’ve read that recently. (Can’t talk about some things until other > people do – then they are public!) :-P > > > > As you probably know, the workaround is to drop the logging levels, and I > don’t think a QFE was scheduled because the workaround is easy. It was > scheduled to be fixed “soon”. > > > > It doesn’t affect Exchange 2010 because that feature didn’t make the RTM > cut (and thus isn’t in Exchange 2010). > > > > *From:* Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 7:03 PM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: SP2 for Exchange 2007 > > > > Yes. > > > > *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:57 PM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: SP2 for Exchange 2007 > > > > You had the values at “maximum” or “expert”? > > > > > > > > *From:* Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 6:20 PM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: SP2 for Exchange 2007 > > > > When we enabled it, it caused email item attachments to get stripped from > emails after they were sent, and it removed item attachments from some > appointments but left an item reference attached. This caused the > Availability Service to fail to return any FB information for a user that > had one of those appointments anywhere in the search window. > > > > We had several re-occurring meetings get corrupted this way, and most of > the attendees were executives and dept. managers. There for a while there > would be blocks of several days/weeks that wouldn’t return any information > at all on a FB search of those users. It was a very long week trying to > figure out what was doing it, and a very long weekend getting it > straightened out. > > > > MS is supposed to be writing up a bug report on it, but I haven’t seen it > yet. > > > > *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:07 PM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: SP2 for Exchange 2007 > > > > And why not? > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Campbell, Rob < > rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net> wrote: > > I did. > > > > I highly recommend that you NOT enable the mailbox auditing feature. Other > than that, no problems. > > > > > > *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:37 PM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* SP2 for Exchange 2007 > > > > I know it became available a few months ago, did you guys upgrade? > > Should I? > > -- > Stefan Jafs > > ************************************************************************************************** > > Note: > > The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential > and > > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. > > ************************************************************************************************** > > > > > -- > Stefan Jafs > > ************************************************************************************************** > > Note: > > The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential > and > > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. > > ************************************************************************************************** > > ************************************************************************************************** > > Note: > > The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential > and > > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. > > ************************************************************************************************** > > ************************************************************************************************** > > Note: > > The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential > and > > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to > > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. > > ************************************************************************************************** > > -- Kind regards, Andrew Levicki MCITP MCSE CCNA and...@levicki.me.uk www.andrewlevicki.eu
