I've often thought about the time someone discovers this workaround to get an effectively unlimited mailbox size. I'd have to feed them to the pigs, of course.
From: bounce-8976468-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:bounce-8976468-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: 18 June 2010 12:56 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Store brought down by a user today No. Once something has left a user's "Deleted Items" folder, it no longer counts against their quota. But it's still in the database until (at the very least) online maintenance the next morning; and depending on the settings of Deleted Item Recovery, perhaps for much longer. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bill Songstad [mailto:bsongs...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Store brought down by a user today I'm curious, wouldn't mailbox limits with suitably low prohibit send thresholds have prevented this problem? Bill On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Eric <seag...@gmail.com<mailto:seag...@gmail.com>> wrote: I've never heard of PolyMon so thanks for the heads up, I'll check it out myself since free is good :) On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com<mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote: For my clients that can't afford third party monitoring environments/tools, I'm using PolyMon. It works very well, and does 95% of what ServersAlive did for me. And it's "free". Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com<http://theessentialexchange.com/> -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com<mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 6:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Store brought down by a user today On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 15:21, Michael B. Smith <mich...@smithcons.com<mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote: <snip> > (Note: I can no longer recommend ServersAlive, despite having used it > for OVER a decade, because it doesn't support Server 2008, much less > Server 2008 > R2.) Well that's not happy. I was thinking about upgrading, because I'm just not finding the time to put into nagios, but if that's the case, I may have to reconsider. Kurt