I just bought a cert from them and it comes standard with 5 SANs. I may try them when it comes time for my exchange cert to expire. I used Verisign because at the time Thawte didn't have SANs and Verisign was one of the only that did and worked with Exchange/mobile (or so I was told).
A lot has changed since then and I have to say getting this cert was pretty painless. From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 9:16 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SSL recomendations We use them for our SAN certs. Work great and since I don't have to give my money to VeriSign, it makes me feel good inside. From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 6:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SSL recomendations They get my vote. ________________________________ From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com] Sent: 23 August 2010 07:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SSL recomendations Hi Steve I can certainly second the endorsement of Digicert. Not the cheapest but they are endorsed by MS as a UC cert vendor and I've always found there support to be top notch! Regards [cid:image001.jpg@01CB42D6.30ABA160] Peter Johnson I.T Architect United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542 South Africa: +27 11 252 1100 Swaziland: +268 442 7000 Fax:+27 11 974 7130 Mobile: +2783 306 0019 peter.john...@peterstow.com<mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com> www.peterstow.com<http://www.peterstow.com> This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company. Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or otherwise. The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower. No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send this e-mail. [cid:image002.jpg@01CB42D6.30ABA160] From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com] Sent: 20 August 2010 19:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SSL recomendations Lots of questions today! I'm getting a cert for the new 2007 server. We currently have 2 servers using different domain names that we will be consolidating into 1. We will be consolidating domain names as well, but sometimes old habits (and shortcuts) die hard. Our real world server name convention is mail.domain.com I'm thinking that I need to specify five FQDNs in the cert request: mail.domain1.com, autodiscover.domain1.com, mail.domain2.com, autodiscover.domain2.com, realservername.domain1.com . Is that correct? Secondly, I've been asked to get the cert from Godaddy. Does anyone know offhand if their StandardSSL for Multiple Domains is the right cert to get? Thanks in advance! Steve ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.clearswift.com<http://www.clearswift.com> **********************************************************************
<<inline: image001.jpg>>
<<inline: image002.jpg>>
