The only benefit to splitting the logs and db comes from specific recovery scenarios but with the cost and ease of a dag, that just makes more sense.
Otherwise the layout makes sense to me. jlc On Jun 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, "Jean-Paul N" <jnat...@hotmail.com<mailto:jnat...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, I'm going to set up a new exchange 2010 server (single server solution) the server has 6 drives and I'm looking for optimal config, ~ 70 users <100gb store for now. I was initially thinking 1 mirror OS and tlogs then raid 10 (4 drives) for the database (these will all be 7.2k 500gb sata drives), then I was reading that with the improved I/O on 2010 it feasible to put the the Tlogs and database on the same array, can anyone throw some suggestions / recommendations for possible configs? Jean-Paul Natola --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
