On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Bernd Steinhauser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bryan Østergaard wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> doenvd is rarely useful because you almost always need to generate its
>>> input
>>> in an ebuild and doing so directly in "${IMAGE}"/etc/env.d/ is easier
>>> than
>>> generating a temporary file and running doenvd on that. As a solution to
>>> this
>>> Ciaran suggested that we create a hereenvd function that takes a file
>>> name
>>> and a heredoc as input:
>>>
>>> hereenvd 40foo <<EOF
>>> BAR=baz
>>> EOF
>>>
>>> Similarly the following list of functions could be added:
>>> herebin, hereconfd, heredoc, hereenvd, hereexe, hereinfo, hereinitd,
>>> hereman,
>>> heremo and heresbin.
>>>
>>> Please discuss!
>>>
>> Sounds like a good idea.
>>
>> hereenvd makes a lot of sense and I guess hereconfd and hereinitd
>> might be useful as well but is there any need for all the other
>> functions?
>
> Hm, maybe heresbin/hereexe could be useful for wrappers and things like
> that.
>
> Though, I don't have the slightest clue what hereman could be useful. Oo
>
Wrappers should be handled by alternatives, right?Regards, Bryan Østergaard _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
