On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:53:20 +0100
"David Leverton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/23 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Annotations-wise, we're looking at implementing option restrictions
> > ('foo needs bar', 'foo and bar are mutually exclusive' etc) as
> > annotations. At what point do we want to signal an error if these
> > restrictions aren't met? The pretend phase?
>
> Isn't annotation support supposed to be optional for the package
> manager?For deps, yeah, because they're not fully implemented. For MYOPTIONS we can define a minimally required set. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
