Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:31:07 +0000
Ingmar Vanhassel <[email protected]> wrote:
Is the (performance) benefit of 'last' over 'first' really worth
making it slightly less obvious where a package resides?
first's unworkable for x11. We end up with 150ish packages under x/,
which is no good.
Why not just split it?
First 50 packages in x/, then the next 50 in x2/ etc.
Of course that isn't the nicest way to find a package, but it wouldn't
require more time to find something than using the last letter.
Or maybe x/1/ x/2 instead, or even x/ with some subdirs with „proper“ names?
_______________________________________________
Exherbo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
