On Monday 13 July 2009 21:42:57 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:30:18 +0200 > > Arne Janbu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I had a package that depended either on nautilus or on > > > > kdebase (konqueror). That was acetoneiso2. > > > > > > What kind of dependency? > > > > It was on Gentoo but would also fit for exheres-0. It is a run > > dependency. Here you can see the ebuild: > > http://github.com/funtoo/portage/blob/7bfa1e679c7acea683996af9607f69358cb > >60c83/app- cdr/acetoneiso2/acetoneiso2-2.0.2.ebuild > > Would a suggested post dependency upon both, with an explanatory remark > saying why, be adequate?
That depends if that is what you think is ok for exheres-0. If you say, these dependencies should be handled that way for exheres-0 i could live with it. The question is if possible users would find that an appropriate solution that doesn't irritate them.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
