Anders Ossowicki wrote:
What about extending options ? something like:
mp3 : enable mp3 support using default implementation
mp3~mad : prefere mad as mp3 decoder
-mp3~lame : do not use lame to encode mp3
I think this is a needless complication. In general, you do not care
which library a package use to enable support for something. If we go by
this approach, you will increase the amount of (mostly uninformed) choices
that has to be made. Even if, by default, the choice is 'everything' a
user will have to consider it, have to dig through even more information.
And even if – for some reason – we will find out that something like that is necessary, we can still introduce a mechanism to do things like that. ;-)

_______________________________________________
Exherbo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev

Reply via email to