On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:13:19PM +0100, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > On 14.01.2012 00:30, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote: > > I suggest removing busybox from the system set (and make the few > > packages that need it, if any, depend on it directly). > > Ok, two in favour of this change, two against it (out of lazyness). > > Who's going to be the tie-breaker? :-)
I won't object once there's a 'stages' or similar set in place, for stuff not required but wanted by default. _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
