Philip Hazel wrote: > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Daniel Tiefnig wrote: >> There's an error mismatch in test 2027: > > Hmm. I wonder if that is something to do with different GnuTLS > versions? I am using GnuTLS 1.2.3.
Duh, apparently I overlook your mail till now. :o/ I'm linking against 1.2.6 here. > I should probably document what options are sensible to use; perhaps > only -d actually makes sense. Oh dear, I just guessed I had to specify "-t <num>" to run a specific test, and as that worked out I thought I'm correct with that. Hadn't read your README carefully enough... > Why doesn't everybody run things the way I want them to? <grin> Well, if something doesn't work as intended, and you don't want to fix it, just put it in the README and pretend it IS intended. :o) lg, daniel -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
