Philip Hazel wrote: > I may have to start sending you patches for that. I did change the > name of a cipher to one that I thought should be recognisable.
Hmmm. "openssl ciphers" says: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA AES256-SHA EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA DES-CBC3-MD5 DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA AES128-SHA RC2-CBC-MD5 DHE-DSS-RC4-SHA RC4-SHA RC4-MD5 RC4-MD5 RC4-64-MD5 EXP1024-DHE-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA EXP1024-DES-CBC-SHA EXP1024-RC2-CBC-MD5 EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA DES-CBC-SHA DES-CBC-MD5 EXP1024-DHE-DSS-RC4-SHA EXP1024-RC4-SHA EXP1024-RC4-MD5 EXP-EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA EXP-EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA EXP-DES-CBC-SHA EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 EXP-RC4-MD5 EXP-RC4-MD5 >> The MessageID is different, hard to spot at the first glance. >> test-mail-munged also contains lots of the following line: >> aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa > > That may be a hard one; different message ids usually means a timing > effect has put the messages into a different order. Ah, that doesn't sound good. Indeed another two testruns finished successfully, the third failed again. lg, daniel -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
