On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:17:17PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Does displaying semantically useless information make sense? That's the > > point where no consensus could be reached in the past. Perhaps that's > > why RFC 2822 does not even mention the topic. > > To pick a specific example of 'semantically useless information', let's > look again at http://david.woodhou.se/evo-ate-my-spam-report.jpeg > > My answer to your question would be a resounding 'yes'. It _does_ make > sense to display it as it was sent. There was often a _reason_ it was > sent the way it was.
As I said, there is no consensus on this. Let's note that, following the result of past discussions on RFC 2822, we won't agree on it, too. Michael -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
