On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Philip Hazel wrote: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Tony Finch wrote: > > > They want to be able to run users' .forward files at verification > > time, in order to be able to reject local parts with affixes that the > > user has not defined. > > Presumably by running a redirect router with no_more set for affixed > local parts?
Actually it has separate .forward and .forward-suffix directors, and suffixes aren't optional for the latter. No other directors match the addresses, so no_more isn't necessary. > I understand the requirement, but I am not happy with the proposed > solution. It seems to me to be too kludgey. I don't like the fact that > it won't work if a user's .forward file is not readable by the exim > user. Yes, it does depend on lax .foward file permissions, but that's true for the Exim 3 implementation too. Your alternative suggestion does sound like a more reliable approach. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
