Hello, I am currently working on mail notifications for the Exim Sieve implementation (so I am not entirely off-topic;) and came accross a problem:
Are argument hnames in the query part of mailto URIs caseful? RFC 2368 does not tell if the argument hnames resulting from splitting the query part into pieces are caseful or not. Neither does draft-duerst-mailto-bis-02. I did not get a response from asking the authors. In general, RFCs describing specific schemes must state if anything is to be considered caseless. Nothing is said -> caseful. Hnames are caseless -> caseless. Who will get a message resulting from the URI below and how will it look like? mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using caseful names, the message would go to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but listing both recipients in the header, in case the client trusts the message. In case it does not and allows only safe headers, the message would go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and only listing that address in the header. Any hints towards references I overlooked will be appreciated. Please respond by private mail and I will summarise. Michael -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
