Quoting Philip Hazel: > The *only* reason for the existence of $received_for is so that it can > be used in the value of received_header_text. > > There is already a variable called $recipients, but it is set only in > situations (documented) where it is OK for all the recipients to be > know. Expansion of received_header_text is not one of those situations.
ok, but spool_mbox has nothing to with received headers, so I wonder why Tom used received_for there, when $recipients is available and doing the right thing. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
