On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:52 +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> which is clearly bogus because on non-gcc it leads to syntax errors in
> many macros like the following and the ones I broke in memcheck.h
>
> #define RUNNING_ON_VALGRIND __extension__ \
> ({unsigned int _qzz_res; \
> VALGRIND_DO_CLIENT_REQUEST(_qzz_res, 0 /* if not */, \
> VG_USERREQ__RUNNING_ON_VALGRIND, \
> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); \
> _qzz_res; \
> })
>
> I'm not immediately sure how to fix it properly.
Can we turn the ({ ... }) extension into a static inline function? Or is
that not sufficiently portable either?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
[email protected] Intel Corporation
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
