On 2011-01-27 at 17:17 +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Phil Pennock wrote: > > > > A patch which also works with lookups enabled on the make command-line > > is available for review at: > > > > > > http://git.exim.org/users/pdp/review.git/commit/44e47ad200b45cf7ff4d136ddc1a0e64e26eb1a0 > > I've done a test build on Solaris which worked OK. Also squashed the PATH > to avoid the large african migratory herding mammals in my home directory... > > :; env - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/opt/SUNWspro/bin make
Thanks. Committed to master repo as: http://git.exim.org/exim.git/commit/0cc9542ab26b35cba3a5523acb8991eb18ce0656 Git etiquette issue: I try to avoid spurious "merge"s in the master repo history (not always successfully). So I end up using a git client to pull from head, fetch the changes, then cherry-pick them, so they get a new SHA1 identity. Is this acceptable, having different identities for patches being tracked for inclusion vs in the master repo, or should I learn to suck it up and have merge commits in the master? -Phil -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
