On 2011-02-12 at 21:17 +0100, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > I'm not sure if I got what you want to tell me.
Oh, you got it, I was just wrong. I'd never switched a bool to an expanded bool and hadn't considered the no_* prefix stuff, so hadn't noticed the special support for this. Okay, looks good as is. Sorry. -Phil -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
